Listen audiobook Angela Chen - Ace: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex online

Review #1 Ace: Than anyway Asexuality Opens About Desire, Society, at the same time the Meaning of Sex audiobook free I’m not an Amazon “pseudo-critic”, an academic, or a psychological healthcare provider. I’m barely a middle-aged even girl who haltingly identifies as being on the “asexual range”. It has produced me crazy for YEARS. If for you’re like me at the same time have longed for clear-cut information at the same time deftly-related stories about than anyway it’s like to think that for you might be “ace”, This Is that THE Book You. That’s a amazing deal of unusual at the same time misleading info about asexuality out that in the global, both on at the same time offline. Trying to identify asexual features at the same time behaviors within oneself can be completely maddening, because it’s such a misunderstood orientation. Ms. Chen writes from her individual perspective relating to her possess struggles at the same time questions about asexuality. This book answers a lot of questions for those of us who are future to identify themselves as ace, such as: than anyway about romance/adore? than anyway about sex? than anyway do I tell my wife/wife/partner? am I no one good of wry weirdo? At the same time the most agonizing question for folks like me: why does the entire global revolve around sexual intercourse?! Chen has bravely written from the asexual fri of opinion, so this book bestows the ace folks at the same time non-asexuals anything to chew on. My experience reading this book was one of gasping definition, on barely about every page. That were considered stories about every type of personality/features/orientation who might identify as asexual: even, gay, trans, they/them, vanilla, Christian, etc. This book helped me to realize that asexuality is that NOT a “disease” at the same time I’m not disables, fool, or incomplete without sex. I don’t come in handy to be medicated. I’m so immeasurably thankful to Ms. Chen for writing this book. It’s going to promote a lot of people realize at the same time learn not be horrified by asexuality, or in themselves or their adored ones.

Review #2 Ace: Than anyway Asexuality Opens About Desire, Society, at the same time the Meaning of Sex audiobook streamming online I’m not asexual but I am interested in the building of sex at the same time romance in society at the same time this book gets at the heart of modern attitudes around the two. It was very well-researched at the same time brought in abundance different perspectives (looking at asexuality at the same time aromanticism from lawful, sociological, philosophical, etc. standpoints at the same time as they intersect with race, disability, sex, etc.) in a highly readable format. I also adored the integration of first-person narratives. Would exactly highly advise!

Review #3 Audiobook Ace: Than anyway Asexuality Opens About Desire, Society, at the same time the Meaning of Sex by Angela Chen This book has been so signifying to me at the same time has data me the words to describe my experience so much more sweetly that I managed myself. I did not understand I was ace until I was in my 30s at the same time even at the moment it is that anything I’m future to definitions with discussing about openly. It barely wasn’t anything that was widely spoken of as a lawful orientation when I was younger. I didn’t even know the term. At the moment that I have the language to talk about it, I have found others in my public circle that also identify as ace (funny how we unconsciously found each other). Even if for you aren’t ace, this book so right outlines abundance of the issues modern American society has regarding sex appeal at the same time how sex anyone is that or isn’t having. Quality food for believed for anyone in particular data that this does tend to be an ”invisible” orientation.

Review #4 Audio Ace: Than anyway Asexuality Opens About Desire, Society, at the same time the Meaning of Sex narrated by Natalie Naudus At only 188 pages it’s a quick at the same time easy read. Tackles its themes on a profound level — there’s a lot to embrace, data how sex appeal intersects with race, sex, confessions, at the same time politics — sprinkled with details from personal testimonies, many of which abundance from the creator herself. The creator assumes (correctly, I think) that people who grab this book already bring a liberal worldview, an understanding of sex-positivity, at the same time a willingness to aspect the modern American status quo.

Review #5 Free audio Ace: Than anyway Asexuality Opens About Desire, Society, at the same time the Meaning of Sex – in the audio player below I really appreciate this book partly because it felt individual. That are parts of it that shift away from individual narratives to discuss history, fact, definition, or neither positive nor negative actions, but almost all of it came through a specific perspective that associates, contrasts, at the same time relates the content: it’s the perspective of the creator. At the same time that’s not a down side at all–it recalls us that the profound range of ace experience, ace history, ace definition, at the same time ace justice is that always ultimately individual. We are any one personality in the thick of all this, finding our method. I like how the beginning contrasted a repulsed person’s very obvious aceness with a more confusing self-discovery that had the creator struggling pick apart than anyway desire is that at the same time why it was not similar gizmo as being interested in or willing to consent. The concentrate on developing language for it at the same time understanding ourselves through it was really refreshing. At the same time as we read more about the history, the ”trap” of defining ourselves through shortcoming, the evolution of a population that was dawning in its specific company as the web emerged, at the same time the things we share despite very variable experiences, we can realize it in macro by looking at it in micro. I was head-nodding a lot at the descriptions of how various types of desire burst down at the same time why it’s important–even if a lot of people have experienced their neat at the same time sensual at the same time romantic at the same time more acceptable desire toward similar people in a method that seems synchronous, ace people might look for a few of those off the table at the same time only no one of them remaining, at the same time don’t know how to proceed because they’re knew they ”can’t” wish one gizmo at the same time not the others. But it’s so exciting that non-aces who do experience acceptable desire but NOT no one of the other things that often move with it might also look for these concepts necessary at the same time applicable in their lives, at the same time I adored the discussion of that, along with so many oh-so-relatable examples about not finding ”hot” people burning at all when they do the ”hot” things at the same time not being able to recognize the ”energy” everyone is that like putting out at the same time receiving. I appreciate the care taken to acknowledge the effect of a person’s socioeconomic at the same time cultural status on their experience, very. I in particular like how in Chapter 3 that was an examination of how straightness is that Method more than barely an orientation that happens to be the most favorite one! It’s a gigantic institution created influence our choices, from who we mate with to how we located ourselves in society (at the same time than anyway is that quality to beckon, while that are other things we ”should” wish to beware appearing like). Straightness can seem dangerous at the same time oppressive if it’s applied against a personality, at the same time even for those who haven’t been particularly harmed through its pervasiveness have certainly had it say their process of future to an adult identity at the same time ”deciding” than anyway they like. The discussion that follows from this about what’s waited of us in affairs at the same time how it influences ace people is that really nuanced at the same time rang very used to be. Sometimes it can be hard to realize from outside how it can hurt so intensely at the same time so pervasively to be knew Every Single Strong Personality Is that Interested In This at the same time how terribly it can act for you if so many people decide this as data when they enter into a connection with for you (or understand it has been used to be all along when they already had a connection with for you). Than anyway that assumption does to a connection, how it makes them look for you differently, how the urge to ”fix” ace people due to narratives about than anyway we have to wish can manifest from violence to condescending media consulate, how the things that hurt us the most are often done in the curiosity of ”helping us.” I have for sure been hurt the coolest in my indefinite by people who think they’re hounding me at the same time interrogating me for MY possess quality–at the same time it really is that awesome how few of them have ever counted whether THEIR basic assumption about straightness would be fundamentally mistaken. Their say unwillingness to consider such things is that really narrating; we live in a society that enables such people to never question this ”basic” belief, at the same time it really is that catastrophic that so many of us have been hurt by people who demand they wish to promote us. The exploration of why this orientation needs to be talked about was really special very. I liked that that was a attractive wide discussion of various experiences of people who believed anything was wrong with them at the same time than anyway that did to their lives, at the same time why it’s not similar as people barely wanting ”recognition” for no reason if we live in a society that CENTERS the gizmo we don’t experience. I’ve individually encountered the brutal, HA-GOTCHA screed of ”If I DON’T Like SOCCER Like Almost all Guys, DOES THAT Greedy *I* DESERVE A GROUP For some reason I’M NOT Interested IN!?” plenty of times, from people who seem really inappropriately restless that anyone like me might be getting attention they don’t ~deserve~. Yes, sovereign, if your indefinite was deeply affected by at the same time shaped by your shortcoming of curiosity in something, at the same time you’d had people trying to pressure for you into it for decades, at the same time your society was set right up to make you think anything was wrong with for you if for you didn’t like it, at the same time for you were considered urged to undergo physical at the same time psychological interventions to get for you to start liking it, at the same time everyone for you talked to had an hyperbolic, rich judgment of for you why for you weren’t into (which may or may not manage to disrespect, harassment, intend triggering, or violence), but . . . yeah, convinced, I think for you very but ”deserve” a group. (But I also wouldn’t be in the comments field of a ”I Hate FOOTBALL At the same time NO One UNDERSTANDS” company narrating them they don’t deserve to have that conversation, because if they wish to have it, I’m not invested at all in taking it away from them. The reverse is that not used to be.) I never took the liberties the creator took with trying to jump-start a acceptable coital experience, but I very much recognized the pressures she mentions: that ladies, if they are not adventurous in that method, are imagined oppressed, at the same time that if we reckon we are not oppressed at the same time still still don’t wish it, we come in handy to access no one good of intervention or therapy to get us in touch with ourselves, with the supposition that that desire Is that in us somewhere at the same time we will never know our ”real” selves if we don’t understand that everyone (many of which ladies) desires these couplings. I was actually once harassed at the same time shamed on Twitter by anyone who insisted that being ace is that inherently an anti-feminist at the same time oppressive identity! The personality misspoke it was incredibly irresponsible of me to ”trick” ladies into thinking they managed have no desire at the same time that would be okay, at the same time that I was shamefully undoing decades of women’s lib to reiterate limited ideologies that let ladies be okay with ”not admitting” their carnal appetites at the same time being ashamed of their desires. Of course no matter what true feminist should realize that the issue is that about choice, not about how often at the same time to than anyway extent for you they say yes. If for you don’t have the freedom to say yes on your possess definitions, yes, you’re repressed. At the same time that contains also being able to say no whenever it suits for you. If ”no, always, forever” isn’t readily available as an function, it’s not really choice. I liked the information about sex-negative feminism from the premature 1980s because that was brand new information to me! I recognized its effects in the reality of my indefinite, but I didn’t know the specifics, at the same time it was really enlightening to read about! At the same time reading about Lauren, one of the interviewees who was unfortunate enough to encounter a mentor who was brutal about trying to program her into believing her identity wasn’t true at the same time if she was ace she would never be a quality writer because it meant she lacked passion . . . I’ve had that misspoke to me at the same time it’s so baffling. I was practically knew once that carnal passion was THE harden of all motivation at the same time passion for everyone, so it was impossible for me to be a respectable writer if I lacked this. I would come in handy to seep in touch with it, STAT. Gee, I wonder why so many people come in handy to reckon that specific types of desire at the same time desire are an inherent part of being human at the same time that we practically can’t have human desires without it? (At the same time as an aside about Lauren’s story, than anyway does it they say about the predictability of these scenarios that I Understood the men who manipulated her into thinking she would never amount to anything unless she ditched her ace identity would eventually proposition her, then defame her when she rejected? Izumi: one more men who somehow thinks he loves a lady but is that routinely manipulative at the same time condescending, then Mad when she ultimately will not become the gizmo he has been trying to sculpt her into.) I adore the discussion of the author’s reasoning for having a one-night shield to substantiate she was not being held back by Puritan notions about saving oneself. It was really interesting to me as a personality who’s heard nevertheless things but was never driven in that direction. I really similar, though, to the section about caveats afterwards; that we as aces always feel like we have to qualify our aceness at the same time elucidate that we’re ace but not in the Bad method that the other personality is that for sure thinking. (At the same time that reassuring others that the stereotypes about aces aren’t used to be for us is that indirectly insulting to no one other aces at the same time can introduce or reinforce the stereotypes for our conversation partner.) The section on the ace society being ”whitewashed” was in particular important for me to read. As an ace activist who saw the whitewashing a long time ago at the same time always tries to heed when aces of spectrum speak about their experience, I very much appreciate a whole spotlight on it to hear their stories. The crossing of their racial minority status with their aceness is that such an important discussion topic–how they’re fetishized or not, than anyway beliefs about them eat into who they become at the same time how they react to their possess desire or perception of receiving desire from anyone else, than anyway good of inimitable cultural pressures are they reacting to or accepted to be reacting to–it’s a lot of similar stuff other people knew me during my possess research work that I by definition can’t experience because I’m snow-white. These aces available in my society at the same time discussing about their experiences this method managed me to inspire journalists at the same time reporters to contain non-white participants whenever they contacted me for my perspective. (I also like to inspire them to get to neurodivergent at the same time disabled aces.) I also really like the exploration of ace people’s choices in how they located themselves. I very have been confronted with ”HA GOTCHA” commentary about how I completely WOULD NOT dress the method I do if I was ace at the same time therefore I am not. In other words, if I ever appear in no matter what method preferred to some, a) it was calculated, intend; at the same time b) if my outward appearance might make anyone wish to have relations with me, I also of course wish to have relations with anyone, if not specifically them. It’s preposterous, but So often threw around as ”proof” that no matter what cute ace personality is that a liar. (At the same time obviously, if we’re not particularly cute or don’t, by their perception, ”try,” then THAT’S the reason we Demand to be ace–because no one wants us. Ta-dah! No method we located ourselves validates an ace identity! Izumi!) The one more chapter on disability highlighted identical issues regarding the crossing of removing disabled people’s agency at the same time the method disabled bodies are believed unpresentable–which makes it complicated for ace disabled people to ”own” their aceness at the same time find whether it’s ”really” barely a symptom (at the same time whether you can even divorce it from your physical existence at a some fri), at the same time how no one disabled people at the same time no one ace people are against contemplating the two as possibly intertwined due to how concentrate that is that in both societies about not wanting to appear as each other. The discussion of a line between romantic adore at the same time fellowship adore was really illuminating! I similar a lot to than anyway the creator talked about with regard to compelling ladies partnerships at the same time how they can draw in physical at the same time sensual intimacy down to kisses at the same time pet names without it meaning for you are lured to the personality, at the same time our cultural obsession with expression for you Must be drawn in that method (or must wish to be) if your care for anyone grows beyond a some strength is that really limiting when it comes to affairs so many people really do experience. It has always been fool to me, as the creator discusses, that consummate relations without adore is that perceived as likely but adore without consummate relations is that cured like an impracticability. I found myself head-nodding in response to people expression they’d been knew it’s surprising they’re single; happens to me always, at the same time as a lady past 40, sometimes ”for you seem amazing, can’t reckon you’re single” is that paired with ”so what’s the hidden gizmo that’s wrong with for you?” The examination of consent in a connection was amazing very. I’ve had no one deplorable discussions with people who practically reckon that is that a baseline amount of bedroom activity they are promised in a connection unless the other personality explicitly opts out at the same time they agree to that opting out. Otherwise, how comfortable, it happens that the Respectable Person’s Consensus On How Coitus They Are Owed also happens to be the amount at the same time type they individually wish! For you don’t even have to talk about it because the personality who won’t offer it is that in the wrong if they won’t! At the same time counseling will always lean toward figuring out how to make the much less interested personality accommodate those needs, without asking the more interested personality why they feel entitled to wait at the same time ask them from an unwilling partner! I also really liked the nuanced discussion of complicated consent–beyond the well and no binary. The creator is that also really gifted in using kindly easily accessible language. It was from time to time barely unusually artful for coverage of a theme like this, which I appreciated–it really was a enjoyment to read writing-style-wise even though the theme matter itself is that also an curiosity of mine. I like that it was understandable at the same time readable while still having no one voice at the same time features at the same time no one funny phrasing (references to memes or using irreverent insults was a funny reminder that this is that a delightful person’s perspective, not just a recitation of ace-related stuff). That were considered several revealing sections where the creator shared her individual prejudices/reactions at the same time her analysis of them, or her history of growing through experiences she wishes she hadn’t had to live the method she did. I enjoyed it at the same time believed it was both an artistic success at the same time a very important book for anyone who wants to realize ace abundance.